Jump to content

Talk:Dimerization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference

[edit]

This page needs some type of reference, added tag.--FloNight 20:30, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Clutter

[edit]

The stub templates at the bottom make this article really cluttered. I think we might want to do something about it. --Ruff Bark away!


first paragraph says covalent bonds.....second paragraph says no covalent bonds. clarify please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.62.231 (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dimer Graphs and Statistical Mechanical Dimers

[edit]

The page needs a discussion of this topic —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.198.202.35 (talk) 10:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"structurally similar" ?!

[edit]

The monomers of a dimer don't need to be "structurally similar". I corrected the text.

--Felix Tritschler (talk) 14:22, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve amended the article description correspondingly.
- SquisherDa (talk) 22:39, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Wider usage of the term!

[edit]

"A dimer .. is an oligomer consisting of two monomers" . . uh, except when it isn’t. The article is written from a polymer-chemistry standpoint - where focus is typically on degree of polymerisation. But diatomic gases, for a familiar example, are spoken of as dimeric. And in the world of, eg, UV lasers, the excited / excitation dimers central to excimer technology are diatomic species. Both standpoints are valid; and I’d think there are likely to be others.

Can anyone add to the article accordingly?

- SquisherDa (talk) 22:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2022 and 7 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mehakk12, MD092022, Aaronkroeker (article contribs). Peer reviewers: JellyfishFan, Chhan02, Grapesszz, Hotdawgluver420, Baddweather, Cemes4.

— Assignment last updated by Tiff592 (talk) 00:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dimers

[edit]

Slightly tortuous vocabulary theme: IUPAC defines "dimerization" but not "dimer". "Dimerization". Diborane is often described as a dimer, but the monomer basically does not exist as far as I can tell. We can agree that borane will dimerize, but it seems deceptive to describe diborane as a dimer of an extremely elusive species. We do not describe ethane as a dimer, although the Gold Book describes the dimerization of methyl radicals. Bottom line: our article dimer probably should be written on "dimerization", which is better defined.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 September 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans 13:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dimerization (chemistry)DimerizationDimerization already redirects to Dimerization (chemistry). Am I missing something here? Is there any other sense of the term that is not chemistry (even in the biochemical senses)? Maybe there is a good reason for the disambiguated title, but I am certainly not seeing it. BD2412 T 12:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning support, but should Dimerization point to the Dimer DAB page or become its own DAB page? The term is also used in biochemistry when referring to the formation of 2-unit oligomer/multimer proteins, but there is no dedicated page on Wikipedia to Protein dimerization (← this is a redirect to the stub, Protein dimer). Search covers the topics well, so I don't think a DAB page is really necessary, which is why I lean to support. ETA: I remembered WP:ONEOTHER and a hatnote might be the best for this. ― Synpath 13:17, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.